Google Says: Everybody Stop Using IE6
Have you heard the news? Google is urging users of it's popular GMail application to stop using Internet Explorer 6 and rather opt for either Firefox or, you guessed it, Chrome. I know the entire community of web developers with breath a huge sigh of relieve once we can put IE6 to bed for good but, what do you think, is this the right move by Google?
Should we still care about IE6 as we head into 2009 or, will this move by Google spell the end for Internet Explorer 6? (Insert applause here) For the most part, if one builds websites and applications using standards, the experience in IE6 is not always that bad but, if you try to do anything remotely 'advanced' we all know what hoops we need to jump through to get IE6 to play nice.
So from a purely selfish personal view I hope this does mean the end of IE6. But what do you think? Looking forward to your comments.
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)





Comments
Vladimir Carrer replied on Fri, 2009/01/02 - 10:58am
Gabe Harris replied on Fri, 2009/01/02 - 11:08am
I read a blog post, unfortunately I can't remember where that summed it up very nicely - Flash files don't run on older versions - they tell people to upgrade. As a web developer, it's unfair to expect me to be concerned with technology that is so old, and was never stellar in the first place. I have decided to let clients know up front that I will not develop sites for IE6. I will insert some messaging that gets displayed after browser detection to direct people to download a better browser (eve if it's just IE7) if they currently have IE6. If I'm not part of the solution, I'm part of the problem, right?
Kudos to Google for urging people to change "fix" their browser. It's a little sleazy to tell people to install Chrome, but I guess they deserve it for pushing people away from that archaic dinosaur, and I'll be a much happier developer in the long run if people do take their suggestion.
I like Chrome, for browsing and developing - but when can I start to see some of the kick-ass add-ons I've grown to love in Firefox?
Nick Hellz replied on Sat, 2009/01/03 - 11:22pm
Schalk Neethling replied on Sun, 2009/01/04 - 8:42am
Jonathan Donster replied on Sun, 2009/01/04 - 11:07am
Philippe Lhoste replied on Mon, 2009/01/05 - 11:38am
It is an interesting, good move: the weight of Google is important here.
But they are playing safe... They don't complain about bad standard support but about JS implementation.
So they can push their "superior" JS implementation (V8) and target only GMail users, a relatively limited number of Web users, compared to the number of visitors of their search engine...
So, while it is a good thing, it is still a bit shy.
I fear we still have to support IE6 for some years... Ditching it as "too old to support it" is unrealistic for generic Web pages, IMO, 20% of visitors using IE6 is still a number big enough to avoid rejecting them.
Web applications are another story, people using them often used moderner browsers, or can be motivated enough to make the switch -- if allowed: as pointed out in the linked article, lot of corporations still use IE6 as "blessed" browser. I suppose that's also why Microsoft can't "force" an upgrade to IE7 (or 8!).
James Sugrue replied on Thu, 2009/01/08 - 7:56am
It would be great if there was no need to support it anymore. I know I upgraded as soon as IE7 was available. But I suppose there's a lot of companies where they just have policies to keep a certain browser - sometimes due to a fear that their internal webapp wasn't tested on IE7.
It's a pity, but IE8 should make IE6 old news :)
Priya Singh replied on Sat, 2010/12/04 - 11:30am
Flash files don't run on older versions - they tell people to upgrade. As a web developer, it's unfair to expect me to be concerned with technology that is so old, and was never stellar in the first place.
Boston web design
Carla Brian replied on Wed, 2012/04/04 - 9:08pm